Kryptic injects secrets through a local daemon. Log in once. After that, npm run dev, dotnet run, and F5 receive secrets over a local socket. The daemon, CLI, SDKs, and encryption engines are open source (GPL-3.0 and Apache-2.0). The server stores ciphertext it cannot open. Machine identities are unlimited and never consume a seat.
Azure Key Vault is the correct store for secrets, keys, and certificates that Azure services consume through managed identity. It is a weak place to start when the user is a developer who needs to run an API on a laptop.
The short version
Kryptic vs Azure Key Vault
Kryptic is for you if
Developers start the app the way they already do. No wrapper command.
Anything that can see a secret in plaintext is open source, so you can read the encryption before you buy.
The server must not be able to read secret values.
SSO and an audit log should ship on Free.
CI pipelines and Kubernetes should not add seats.
Azure Key Vault is for you if
Every consumer is already an Azure resource with managed identity.
No human needs a local secret to press run.
You want Azure to be the only secrets API.
The long version
Kryptic and Azure Key Vault, row by row
Architecture and security
Kryptic
Azure Key Vault
Open source
OffersYes. Daemon and CLI are GPL-3.0. Encryption engines and SDKs are Apache-2.0, at github.com/dev-kryptic. The control plane is commercial.
Does notNo. Azure-hosted, closed source.
Blind store
OffersThe server stores ciphertext only. There is no decrypt path.
Does notAzure can serve plaintext to authorized identities.
Self-hosting
OffersFull platform on Business and Enterprise. Docker Compose or Helm.
Does notAzure-hosted only.
Nothing on disk
OffersDecrypted values live in daemon memory for at most five minutes, then inside the running process.
PartialLocal development commonly falls back to exported or synced files.
Developer experience
Kryptic
Azure Key Vault
Daily workflow
OffersLogin once, then npm run dev, dotnet run, or F5, including Visual Studio.
Does notAzure SDK, CLI, or a copied file.
Microsoft SSO
OffersIncluded on Free. SAML and SCIM on Business.
PartialEntra is how you reach Azure, not a secrets product.
Windows
OffersNamed pipe, Credential Manager, tray app.
PartialAzure tools exist. Local secret files still show up.
Teams, cost, and delivery
Kryptic
Azure Key Vault
SSO on Free
OffersGoogle, Microsoft, and GitHub on every plan, including Free.
PartialEntra is a separate program.
Audit log on Free
OffersImmutable audit log on Free (7-day retention). Values are never logged.
PartialAzure Monitor, if you wire it.
Machine identities
OffersUnlimited and free. They never consume a developer seat.
Does notPay for vault operations and Azure identities.
CI/CD and Kubernetes
OffersMachine identities, CI export, REST API, and a Kubernetes operator on every plan.
PartialAvailable, often with identity or plan limits.
Kryptic wrote this comparison. Azure Key Vault details are as advertised on its public pricing and documentation pages in September 2026. Products change, so check Azure Key Vault's current pages before you decide.
FAQ
Kryptic vs Azure Key Vault
Why choose Kryptic over Azure Key Vault?
For developers who need local secrets. Key Vault is the native store for Azure resources. Kryptic injects secrets when you press run. Microsoft SSO is on Free. The clients that see plaintext are open source.
Does Kryptic support Microsoft login?
Yes. Microsoft SSO is included on every plan, including Free. SAML 2.0 and SCIM 2.0 are on Business and Enterprise.
Is Kryptic open source?
The daemon, CLI, SDKs, and encryption engines are open source at github.com/dev-kryptic. The control plane is commercial.
Can I keep Key Vault and still use Kryptic?
Yes. Key Vault for Azure resources, Kryptic for humans and generic pipelines.